![]() |
Brighton Webs Ltd. statistical and data services for industry |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Index Feedback |
Rain Water Harvesting
Being fascinated by environmental data, I was curious to know if there is a balance between the volume of water that falls on my roof and that flushed down the outside loo. We have a water butt which is fed from approximately 20% of the roof area, so for a few months, I'll dip and drain this and record my findings which can be found here: Sometime in May, a data gathering problem emerged. Once we started using rain water in the garden, measurement became impractical. So during the summer months, I'll make some estimates based on rain fall data, which will appear soon....... What data is available is shown below:
Comment By July it is apparent that:
It seems that a solution which combines bath and shower water with rain water. A 150 to 250 litre water butt (plus pipes and pumps) is a possible solution. Water Metering In many areas, water companies have a legal obligation to install water meters, the objective being to stem the rise in consumption and create some awareness of patterns of consumption. There is some anecdotal evidence that water metering increases the cost of water to the average household illustrating how hard it is to reconcile resource management and the needs of shareholders. The following comments are based on a single leaflet from our local supplier, readers should check what is happening in their area. Water meter readings are used in two calculations, first for the delivery of nice clean water at a cost of approx. 95p/cubic metre, the second for the removal of nasty dirty water at a cost of approx. £1.60/cubic metre.
Its unusual for estimated savings to fully realised in practice, but the above calculations suggest that using bath water for toilet flushing might result in savings of approx. £100/year for the consumer and 50,000 litres for the water company. For such a scheme to be attractive, the cost of installation should be between £250 and £350 which would result in a simple payback of less than 5 years. Water Resources Both water consumption and energy/emissions represent the same problem. The ideal solution is for all of us to consume less. However, the commercial model by which we are supplied links profits to increased consumption (if I was paid by the word, this rant would be longer). We need viable energy and water companies, but we also need a more imaginative framework for them to operate in. Offer this problem to Monty Python, design a system where you get paid more for doing less, a less viable alternative might be to consult a bank. Storage It is clear that the 170 litre water butt is too small, both to harvest the available water and to provide a buffer to provide water during dry periods which might last for several weeks. This leads to two questions. The first is how much storage is actually required, the answer is almost certainly greater than 1,000 litres and probably closer to 2,500 litres. As data accumulates, the answer will become clearer. The second is how much does storage cost. Initial research suggests an installed cost of between 10 and 50p per litre. Reach for a calculator and do the sums and you will see that the choice is between a down-payment on a new car or an off-grid toilet. This choice it typical of DIY planet saving. Safety Further research is needed, not least into the safety implications of water storage which include risk of drowning and the creation of a breeding ground for waterborne diseases. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page Updated: 08-July-10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||